March Madness, Econ style

Unfortunately, I could see not the content Fromt of this page.

View the original article here

Videos on health economics of explicit rationing disutilities

New available on network economics, education, economics, health site is a short video (10 min) by Prof. Theodor Joanna Coast University of Birmingham where he explores the idea of losing the disutility and reject the disutility that developed in her paper, British Medical Journal 1997 this is the first in a series of video interviews that resulted from the development projects supported by the network Economics.

View the original article here

You may require an external about yourself?

Garth Brazelton believes that this argument, I find it somewhat convincing:

My issue is that it keeps saying ' Sin taxes ' is not a Pigovian. Have I disagreed on this point, and I disagree. It is a basic definition of Pigovian tax: a tax levied on marketing that produces negative externalities. The idea is the re-aligns the real social cost of the benefits of the activity. This setting distorts Mankiw and implies that externalities can occur only as an action by one group adversely affects another ... The exterior is there-no external self at the time, is external to the self over time. This is correct behavior that, if a person has had full 20/20 vision and clarity of the whole of their life cycle, a likely will do less. ...And it ignores the real argument that many "sins" are real negative external effects at a given point in time-effect on family and relationships, and often non-monetary, cannot be ignored.

Never thought of this before, but hyperbolic discounting and other forms of time-inconsistent preferences can be a form of external. Can the current non-self-self charge tomorrow by drinking beer too? And this weight is an external?

I wonder if such a behavior name ' external ' are beside the point. If the imposition of those taxes sin is improving social welfare, is really important if you use the external signal?

View the original article here

College Enrollment decreased slightly in 2010

The share of recent high school graduates enrolled in College the October after graduation decreased slightly in 2010, according to a new report from the Department of labour.

High school class of 2010, 68.1 percent of College graduates were registered in October. The comparable share for last year's high school class was 70,1 per cent.

However, two categories had higher rates of College enrollment over the past decades:

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

As you can see, the proportion of graduates who go to College has begun to grow over the years, largely due to the influx of women at institutions of higher education of the nation. Last year, the College enrollment rate amongst women, who were recent high school graduates was 74%, and for men was 62.8 percent.

More temporary factors — such as the economic cycle or a military draft — also appeared to affect decisions young people to go college. For example, its weak economy can help to explain why a record share of graduates chose to enroll in College in 2009.

Last year there were great disparities again in College enrollment among the various ethnic groups. Students of Asian heritage had the highest percentage of College enrollment among young graduates, 85 per cent. It was followed by white students (68.6 percent), black students (61,4%) and Hispanic students (59.6 percent).

Between registered in all recent high school graduates College, the unemployment rate was 22.8 percent. The unemployment rate was higher for those who were not enrolled in College, in participation of 33,4 percent. Remember, however, that unemployment rates reflect only the people actively looking for work.

View the original article here

What's new in the new issue?

As I mentioned in a previous post, the sixth edition of the principles of text recently has been released.  Local search update was easy.  Was sent on the last output to the printer had not even the Democratic nomination to President Obama!  Consider just about everything that happened in the economy and economic policy since then.

If you're wondering, more specifically in the new issue, which was not the last time, see, here's a list.

Chapter 1
New case study: the incentive effects of gasoline prices
Added new paragraph on the last downturn under principle 10
Two new problems
Chapter 2
New in the news box: the economics of President Obama
Table 1 updated and significantly expanded
New caricature in annex

Chapter 3
Tiger Woods Tom Brady changed in-text example.
New question on the review
New problem

Chapter 4
New article for the box in the news: price increases after disasters

Chapter 5
The new FYI: some elasticity in the real world

Chapter 6
New in the news box: unpaid internships may be?

Chapter 8
Box new in the news: new study on TaxationChapter 9
New in the news box: trade skirmishes, about U.S. tariffs on Chinese tires and the retaliatory response
New ProblemChapter 10
New in the new box: the externalities of country living
New in the news box: CAP and trade
New problem

Chapter 11
Introduction of new term: Club were.
New in the news box: the case for toll roads
Two new problems

Chapter 12
New in the news box: the temporarily disappear estate tax
New in the news box: the value added tax

Chapter 13
New problem

Chapter 14
New problem

Chapter 15
New in the news box: President Obama antitrust policy
Two new problems

Chapter 16
Two new problems

Chapter 17
New in the news box: the next big antitrust target?
New problem

Chapter 18
New problem

Chapter 20
New in the news box: what is wrong with the poverty rate?
New in the news box: the cause of a financial crisis
New problem

Chapter 21
New in the news box: backward inclined labor supply in Kiribati
Three new problems

Chapter 22
New in the news box: the arrow problem in practice
New in the news box: sin control

Chapter 23
New in the news box: beyond the gross domestic product
New problem

Chapter 24
New in the news box: shopping for the CPI
New problem

Chapter 25
New in the news box: an economist answer (what makes a nation rich)

Chapter 26
The new FYI: Financial crises
Two new problems

Chapter 27
New in the news box: A cartoonist's Guide to stock picking
New in the news box: the efficient markets hypothesis is broken?
Two new problems

Chapter 28
New in the news box: the rise of long-term unemployment
New in the news box: how much the unemployed respond to incentives do?

Chapter 29
New in the news-box: Mackereleconomics
New section on bank capital, leverage, and the financial crisis of 2008-2009
Much revised section on the tools of monetary policy. It now includes a discussion of the term auction facility and the Fed payment of interest on reserves.
New in the news box: Bernanke at the Fed Toolbox
New question on the review
New problem

Chapter 30
The new FYI: hyperinflation in Zimbabwe
New section: inflation is bad, but deflation might be worse
New in the news box: inflationary threats

Chapter 31
Upgraded to euro, to discuss problems in Greece field
New problem

Chapter 32
New in the news box: alternative exchange rate regimes

Chapter 33
New in the news box: the social effects of economic downturn
New case study: the recession of 2008-2009
New in the news box: modern parallel to the great depression

Chapter 34
The new FYI on the lower limit of 0 (zero)
New in the news box: how big is the fiscal policy multiplier?

Chapter 35
New in the news box: we do need more inflation?

Chapter 36
New (sixth) debate about the issues added vs tax cuts recessions fight walks
New FYI box inflation targeting
New in the news box: what is the optimal inflation rate?
New in the news box: dealing with debt and deficits

View the original article here

Fed's Lockhart: the Central Bank to offer guidance before tightening

Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta President Dennis Lockhart stressed Friday that now is not the time to alter monetary policy but said the Fed will provide guidance to the financial markets before eventually moves away from its easy money policies.

He said that the Fed would eventually raise interest rates and reduce swollen balance sheet by selling Treasurys or mortgage-backed securities.

"We must explain that well in advance, in order to avoid disruption to markets and not give way to bad leadership in the markets," he said, speaking at a breakfast hosted by the Forum Memphis economics. He said that the reduction of the Fed's balance sheet will take time.

"We must do so in a way very reasoned, methodical and non-market disruption," he added.

View the original article here

Global interest rates: where they grow?

The European Central Bank made the first rate increase since 2008, today, this might be a good time to see where they stand on central banks in the world. Click the map below for an interactive timeline of rate cuts and increases around the world, and a snapshot of where global central banks stand now.

View the original article here

Video: Economists see stronger growth after first-quarter Hiccup

Phil Izzo has details on a new survey of distinguished economists, WSJ, which provides for the development of stronger growth later this year even though proposes first quarter GDP will be lower than previous estimates.

View the original article here

The Coase theorem in action

Error in deserializing body of reply message for operation 'Translate'. The maximum string content length quota (8192) has been exceeded while reading XML data. This quota may be increased by changing the MaxStringContentLength property on the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML reader. Line 2, position 8091.
Error in deserializing body of reply message for operation 'Translate'. The maximum string content length quota (8192) has been exceeded while reading XML data. This quota may be increased by changing the MaxStringContentLength property on the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML reader. Line 1, position 8994.
Greg Mankiw's Blog: The Coase Theorem in Action /*-----------------------------------------------Blogger Template StyleName: MinimaDesigner: Douglas BowmanURL: www.stopdesign.comDate: 26 Feb 2004----------------------------------------------- */body { background:#fff; margin:0; padding:40px 20px; font:x-small Georgia,Serif; text-align:center; color:#333; font-size/* */:/**/small; font-size: /**/small; }a:link { color:#191970; text-decoration:underline; }a:visited { color:#191970; text-decoration:underline; }a:hover { color:red; text-decoration:underline; }a img { border-width:0; }/* Header----------------------------------------------- */@media all { #header { width:660px; margin:0 auto 10px; border:2px solid #333399; } }@media handheld { #header { width:90%; } }#blog-title { margin:5px 5px 0; padding:20px 20px .25em; border:1px solid #333399; border-width:1px 1px 0; font-size:225%; line-height:1.2em; font-weight:bold; color:#333399; text-transform:uppercase; font-variant: small-caps; letter-spacing:.18em;background-color: white; }#blog-title a { color:#333399; text-decoration:underline; }#blog-title a:hover { color:red; }#description { margin:0 5px 5px; padding:0 20px 20px; border:1px solid #333399; border-width:0 1px 1px; max-width:700px; font:115%/1.4em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Arial,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:none; letter-spacing:.18em; color:#333399;background-color:white; }/* Content----------------------------------------------- */@media all { #content { width:660px; margin:0 auto; padding:0; text-align:left; } #main { width:410px; float:left; } #sidebar { width:220px; float:right; } }@media handheld { #content { width:90%; } #main { width:100%; float:none; } #sidebar { width:100%; float:none; } }/* Headings----------------------------------------------- */h2 { margin:1.5em 0 .75em; font:90%/1.4em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Arial,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:uppercase; font-weight:normal; letter-spacing:.18em; color:#404040; }/* Posts----------------------------------------------- */@media all { .date-header { margin:1.5em 0 .5em; } .post { margin:.5em 0 1.5em; border-bottom:1px solid #BBB; padding-bottom:1.5em; } }@media handheld { .date-header { padding:0 1.5em 0 1.5em; } .post { padding:0 1.5em 0 1.5em; } }.post-title { margin:.25em 0 0; padding:0 0 4px; font-size:160%; font-weight:normal; line-height:1.4em; color:#990033; }.post-title a, .post-title a:visited, .post-title strong { display:block; text-decoration:none; color:#c60; font-weight:normal; }.post-title strong, .post-title a:hover { color:#333; }.post div { margin:0 0 .75em; line-height:1.6em; }p.post-footer { margin:-.25em 0 0; color:#ccc; }.post-footer em, .comment-link { font:75%/1.4em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Arial,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:small-caps; letter-spacing:.1em; }.post-footer em { font-style:normal; color:#505050; margin-right:.6em; }.comment-link { margin-left:.6em; }.post img { padding:4px; border:1px solid #ddd; }.post blockquote { margin:1em 20px; }.post blockquote p { margin:.75em 0; }/* Comments----------------------------------------------- */#comments h4 { margin:1em 0; font:bold 78%/1.6em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Arial,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:.2em; color:#999; }#comments h4 strong { font-size:130%; }#comments-block { margin:1em 0 1.5em; line-height:1.6em; }#comments-block dt { margin:.5em 0; }#comments-block dd { margin:.25em 0 0; }#comments-block dd.comment-timestamp { margin:-.25em 0 2em; font:78%/1.4em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Arial,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:.1em; }#comments-block dd p { margin:0 0 .75em; }.deleted-comment { font-style:italic; color:gray; }/* Sidebar Content----------------------------------------------- */#sidebar ul { margin:0 0 1.5em; padding:0 0 1.5em; border-bottom:1px solid white; list-style:none; }#sidebar li { margin:0; padding:0 0 .25em 15px; text-indent:-15px; line-height:1.5em; }#sidebar p { color:#666; line-height:1.5em; }/* Profile----------------------------------------------- */#profile-container { margin:0 0 1.5em; border-bottom:1px solid white; padding-bottom:1.5em; }.profile-datablock { margin:.5em 0 .5em; }.profile-img { display:inline; }.profile-img img { float:left; padding:4px; border:1px solid #bbb; margin:0 8px 3px 0; }.profile-data { margin:0; font:bold 78%/1.6em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Arial,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:.1em; }.profile-data strong { display:none; }.profile-textblock { margin:0 0 .5em; }.profile-link { margin:0; font:78%/1.4em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Arial,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:.1em; }/* Footer----------------------------------------------- */#footer { width:660px; clear:both; margin:0 auto; }#footer hr { display:none; }#footer p { margin:0; padding-top:15px; font:78%/1.6em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:.1em; } @import url(http://www.blogger.com/static/v1/v-css/navbar/697174003-classic.css);div.b-mobile {display:none;} Greg Mankiw's Blog Random Observations for Students of Economics

Friday, March 18, 2011 The Coase Theorem in Action Click on graphic to enlarge.? permanent link

About MeName: Greg Mankiw Location: United States I am a professor of economics at Harvard University, where I teach introductory economics (ec 10) among other courses. I use this blog to keep in touch with my current and former students. Teachers and students at other schools, as well as others interested in economic issues, are welcome to use this resource.

View my complete profile

Useful Links My Harvard Website My Favorite Textbooks Old Columns and Talks The Best Way To Learn Economics Blog Map for Textbook Users Previous Posts Optimal Stabilization Policy March Madness, Econ-Style Broadway Producers as Risk-taking Entrepreneurs What's new in the new edition? Fed News Striking Fact of the Day A Shoutout Richard Freeman on Unions Tobin's Q Barro on Unions Advice for Students Advice for Aspiring Economists Where do economists come from? Choosing a Graduate Program Advice for Grad Students Advice for New Junior Faculty Which math courses? Why Aspiring Economists Need Math Love Econ, Bad at Math Summer Reading List JD vs PhD: My Story My Life as a Student PhD or not? Education Beyond the Classroom An engineer seeks career advice A Question about Learning Economics Good Academic, Bad Human Being Are B-school economists different? How to Write Well Principles of Economics Translated Animated Rap Version Acrostic Version A Few Timeless Posts A Must Read The Pigou Club Manifesto Resolutions for Another New Year Outsourcing Redux How do the right and left differ? How to Decentralize Monetary Policy On Inequality How to Recapitalize the Financial System My Personal Work Incentives On Dogs, Names, and Boston How to Identify My Car Powered by Postrank

Archives March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011

 

 

View the original article here

Betting the Fed losing money in the balance sheet is low

An environment of rising interest rates is unlikely to cause the Federal Reserve of losing money on huge holdings, Treasury and agency securities, mortgage-Central Bank report released Monday said.

The report of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco addresses a topic that has not received much attention from observers of central banks. The issue is that the Fed's current sheet counts some 2.4 trillion in securities that is so far a money maker for the EDF. Indeed, the Fed, which sends back the profits of the Treasury Department, returned 80 billion dollars last year.

But it can't last forever the current era of rock-bottom interest rates. With the economy recovery and inflationary pressures which pushed higher, albeit from very low levels, the Fed will begin to tighten monetary policy, both of the European Central Bank as last week. How the Fed will tighten policy is unclear, given the wide range of tools are now available at the Central Bank, nor is there any absolute clarity on the point of a campaign to stop the aid. At this point the market participants are not yet sure whether the Fed will begin to normalize the stance of policy.

But all the same, higher short-term interest rates over time means the Fed will make less money. If an unexpected surge in inflation caused the Fed to tighten policy quite aggressively, it is likely that the Fed could start to lose money on the farm.

This could mean the Fed will have to make sure the money from the public. The fear is that this would expose the Fed lose its independence as a de-facto bailout will come with some sort of strings that could undermine — at least in the eyes of central bankers — activity of the Federal Reserve policy-making.

The Fed's potential exposure to interest rate risk derives primarily from the authority to pay interest on Bank reserves, the paper observed. This feature allows the ypermonterna on Central Bank to compensate banks reserves stationed in the Federal Reserve, largely to preserve these reserves are undermined and economy. But in an environment of rising interest rates, maintains a higher interest rate, the Fed's lower profit level.

The paper claimed that "interest rate risk appears modest, especially compared to the Fed's policy objectives of full employment and price stability."

The San Francisco Fed paper, which was authored by the Director of research, Glenn rudebusch, sees the math accordingly: last year, the Federal Reserve earned 83 billion dollars in interest income on average yield 4% which took about 2 trillion dollars in securities, against 3.1 billion dollars in costs associated with the payment of interest on reserves.

"Short-term interest rates should be increased rapidly in quite high — in the neighborhood of 7% interest expenses — for the Fed to surpass the income from interest. Such an outcome is very unlikely, "said the paper. If the Fed did suffer a loss, this could simply hand no money back to the Treasury and, in the most extreme case, future remittances also will be reduced (and recorded as a change in the deferred credit), but the Fed's capital base and financial position will remain absolutely safe. "

Rudebusch noted that accounting issues are ultimately a regional issue for the EDF. "The statutory mandate for the conduct of monetary policy is to promote maximum employment and price stability," and "economic considerations – even potentially large capital losses – are secondary."

"Regardless of income or capital costs, the Fed still has the operational capacity to raise short-term interest rates to stem inflationary pressures," wrote Economist.

View the original article here

Men, unemployment and disability

Bureau of labor statistics through Haver Analytics

In the worst economic era of the 1950s and ' 60s, about 9 percent of men in the prime of their working lives (25 to 54 years) doesn't work. The depth of a serious recession in the early 1980s, approximately 15 percent of prime-age men does not work. Today, it is not that men work more than 18%.

This is a sad statistic: nearly one of every five men between 25 and 54 are not employed. Yes, some of them are happily retired. Some school. And some care for their children. But none of these categories. Simply not working. They manage to find some other way.

For growing numbers of these men, the Federal disability program is an important source of support. Workers with disabilities — men and women — received 115 billion dollars in benefits last year, and another 75 million dollars in medical costs. (Disability recipients become eligible for Medicare until two years after the entry in order to receive benefits.) The amount of $ 190 billion, equivalent to approximately $ 1500 tax for each American household.

Even disability usually goes unlargely uncovered by the media. Recently, it has not changed. Motoko Rich of the times and Damian Paletta from the Wall Street Journal have both recently written detailed articles.

Explains Mr Paletta:

The program [disabled] is set to soon become the first major benefit federal programme for the implementation of cash — and one of the main reasons are u.s. States and territories have a big say in who qualifies for the funded program. Without changes, social security and Pension Fund can survive intact through about 2040 and Medicare through 2029. The Fund in respect of invalidity, however, will run dry in four to seven years without the intervention of the Federal Government, Congress might say.

Perhaps the worst thing about disability is that, after this, many never leave. To be eligible for disability due to a legitimate injury. But once they stop working, many are less attractive job candidate and less incentives to find work. Their chances of finding Shrivel well-connected ' work. In relation to low-paying job, especially if the task is creating a chronic injury or chronic pain, moderate disability monthly payment of approximately $ 1.100 on average to see attractive.

As the economists David Autor and Mark Duggan have written, "the program provides strong incentives to applicants and beneficiaries can remain permanently from the labor force, and provides no incentive to employers to implement cost-effective accommodations to allow officials with the task constraints to remain at work."

In the same paper (a joint effort of the Center for American progress and the Hamilton project), Mr. Autor and Duggan Mr proposes some changes to the system. The two economists, as written by Mrs. Rich, proposes:

that workers with disabilities be offered services to remain in the workplace and part-time income support. In addition, that support for employers to purchase health insurance, as do unemployment and workers ' compensation, giving them an incentive to accommodate workers, rather than send them for the benefit of Federal mandatory disability rolls.

Most workers who have disabilities, higher cost of insurance company would be.

Given how Variant that already exists in the approaches of Member States for the program — such as Mr Paletta article details — could imagine how an innovative Governor might try to make the State a model for others to follow. Disability and reform should be part of any solution to our huge looming budget deficits.

Three articles from the Times has more details about the problems with the system. So does Ms. Rich's blog post from Thursday.

View the original article here

How to think about Keynesian economics?

International trade/public policy course I teach at Ivey is sufficiently Keynesian. Next time I teach in my course will give students of Arnold Kling on how you think about Keynesian economics-it is brilliant. In particular I find this section useful:

Imagine that all of us were cooks, each with different specialty. In good times, my other restaurants and patronize others patronize me. The economic activity. In recession, for some reason stopped to eat. I don't eat my cooking every meal, but I do not think I can afford to send out. Since I do not protect your restaurant, do you think you have to cut back on eating out, too. Reduced economic activity.

Thinking about the economy in these conditions, the idea of using deficits to boost economic activity makes perfect sense to me.

It reminds me a bit of Paul Krugman baby-sitting scrip history-people stopped using the babysitting scrip, which meant other scrip, no additional decreased which cut back on their use of babysitting scrip and the amount of babysitting.

I believe that Don Boudreaux of money to be taken from somewhere else history (involving the fiscal stimulus cannot function) is not necessarily correct-that money can be horded (such as babysitting scrip). In theory, fiscal stimulus could work if you go the money from being spent to horded. Of course, this does not mean that fiscal stimulus is the best choice-to increase the money supply (or scrip) seems much more efficient,

In General, I believe that taxation is highly inefficient, but my criticism is more practical character.

View the original article here

Forecasters predict tax increases, but not before the elections

The vast majority of economists in the latest survey forecast the Wall Street Journal expect Congress to raise taxes by 2016. But only a handful of waiting to happen before the presidential election of 2012.

By a margin of 6-to-1, of the respondents expect the United States will have to raise taxes sometime over the next five years in order to deal with fiscal problems and the long-term deficit.

spending cuts alone is not enough to achieve fiscal sustainability, said aneta markowska of soci t g n rale.

But by the same margin 6-to-1, don t expect to hit any increase in the next 18 months. At best, would do a neutral tax code reforms, said companies Diane swonk of Mesirow Financial.

As the presidential election looms, the economists don t wait for Congress to try to pass unpopular tax increases. IT would be political suicide, said Nicholas s. perna of perna Associates.

Two-thirds of respondents expect the President will win another term in 2012.

The economic winds will in the back, said Dana Johnson of Bank, Comerica.

Fix: in an earlier version of this post, a quote from Nicholas s. perna of Perna Associates attributed incorrectly to MF Globals Jim o sullivan.

View the original article here

Stiglitz on the deficit

Unfortunately, I could see not the content Fromt of this page.

View the original article here

Government shutdown would delay economic statistics

A partial shutdown of the US Government that would delay the release of economic data, possibly complicating policymakers in the management of the economy.

A failure by Congress to resolve the impasse over the budget before midnight Friday will force the closure labor and the sections of the trade, the two federal agencies said. Published data provide decisive economic snapshots, which shall inform the Federal Reserve's monetary policy decisions.

An agreement to keep the Government funded beyond midnight remains in a deadlock over the size and composition of pieces, a Republican aide said on Friday morning, as Senate Democrats raised funding for abortion services as the remaining obstacle to talks to prevent shutdown.

Most government offices are closed, the greater the impact will be on the release of economic indicators. If the budget impasse, ready for all next week, key releases consumer spending and inflation for March will be postponed.

Federal Reserve officials, anxious to see if increased sharply in global oil prices, grains and other commodities is to create inflation problems at home, you'll have to wait. The Department of Commerce is set to publish the retail sales report Tuesday, while labor consumer price index data set for release April 15. The CPI rose at an annual 2.1% in February from 1,6% in January on the back of higher food and energy costs, leading some officials to predict Fed interest rates might increase this year to keep prices in check.

Other indicators due for release the week beginning 11 April include US import prices for March and February trade data Monday, and weekly jobless claims on Thursday.

Next week the investigation period used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a unit of the Department of labor, report jobs, it also delays possible even for that decisive movement. The employment report for April is scheduled for May 6.

The last Government shutdown left federal offices closed for six days in November 1995 and another three weeks from 16 December 1995 7 Jan. 1996, causing a delay of two weeks to report jobs and 19-day delay in the measures of inflation.

Weekly data on initial applications for unemployment benefits, which provides an up-to-date picture of the labour market, must be subjected to a shorter delay because they are collected by State workers who are not affected by the shutdown. At the last shutdown with 15 years ago, claims were released less than two weeks after the re-opened on Jan. 8.

Weekly inventory and other data from the US Department of energy – key reports often influence the price of petroleum products and fuels — will also be reduced in the case of an extended Government shutdown.

Data published by the Federal Reserve, as the industrial production report due April 15, is not affected because the Central Bank does not rely on Congress funds.

But the Fed's job in steering the economy will become more difficult by the lack of other indicators. Back in 1996, then-Vice President Alan Blinder complained of shutdown that has made it more complicated for the Fed to set interest rates.

View the original article here

Report from the Economics network survey

Network Economics has just released two reports the results of a survey into the teaching and learning of Economics. "Common themes and responsibility" summarises Results from a survey of students and teachers explore how students are preparing for the economic employment "is the total experience from the survey of alumni and employer that survey.

View the original article here

Even terrorists have tilted down demand curves

The AP reports:

If approved al Qaeda operative his itinerary for an airline bombing Christmas 2009 planned, he learned as the start of the strike in the skies over Houston or Chicago, the associated press. But tickets were expensive, so that it aligned the mission on a cheaper destination: Detroit.

View the original article here

Wholesale increase in stocks, but the decline in sales

US stocks rose in February wholesalers, but sales fell, a sign of uncertainty in the economic recovery.

Wholesale inventories rose by 1,0% a seasonal 437.99 billion dollars, the Chamber of Commerce said Friday. The increase in stocks was not necessarily an indication of the wholesalers in storage pending future sales. Rather, goods to be collected as sales fall 0.8%, 378.97 billion dollars. Also, 1.0% increase in stocks was driven by a large gain in oil between the rise in oil prices.

But the fall in sales was not very worrying. Sales in January had surged 3,3%, which was revised from an initial estimate of 3.4%. Year over year sales were 13.7% higher than in February 2010.

Inventories in January rose 1.0%, which was revised from an initial forecast profit of 1.1%. Stocks was 12.7% higher than February 2010.

The report showed wholesale goods had enough to last a little over a month. The proportion of inventory-to-sales measures how many months it took for an operation to destroy the current census. The proportion rose to 1.16 February, 1.14 January. Despite the increase, the gauge is at a level which is considered low, indicating scope for further gains in the manufacturing process as companies, faced with growing demand, goods to keep shelves filled.

Consumer spending has been picking up recently, and the labour market has improved. An extension of the income tax cuts has put more money in consumers ' wallets, helping to remove some of the sting growing food and gasoline prices and falling home prices.

Constellation brands Inc., said this week that it had a profit in its fiscal fourth quarter, with strong sales growth in North America. While the manufacturer suffered during the recession, Chief Executive, Rob Sands, said in a conference call, Thursday, "the consumer is back."

In addition, the unemployment rate fell to a two-year low in March. Still, 8.8%, unemployment is high, restraining the economy's ability to grow quickly.

Inventories are a component of gross domestic product, which is a broad measure of economic activity in U.S. wholesalers account for approximately 30% of all u.s. business inventories, manufacturers and retailers who make up the remainder.

Inventory rebuilding, a major driver in the early stages of economic recovery, slowed at the end of 2010 as sales surged. The storage period to be deducted from GDP during the fourth quarter.

In February, wholesale inventories of goods intended for the last three or more years increased 0.6%. Sales of these so-called durable goods fell by 1.2%. Non-goods stocks rose 1.5%, with oil increased 9.3%. Non-goods sales fell 0.4%.

View the original article here

Yellen says Fed won't repeat mistakes of the 1970s

The Federal Reserve is unlikely to raise interest rates soon because the surge in global commodity prices should have a temporary impact on inflation in the United States, a key official said Monday the Fed.

Conversely, however, the Fed Chairman Janet yellen said prepared remarks that the US Central Bank would monitor closely the evolution of inflation to avoid the mistakes of the 1970s, when high oil prices have led to sharp increases in consumer prices.

The sharp increase in oil prices, grains and other commodities are "unlikely to have a permanent effect on inflation, consumers or derail the economic recovery and hence do not, in my opinion, justify any substantial change in the direction of monetary policy," Yellen said.

He spoke at the Economic Club of New York. The Fed's no. 2 official, an influential member of the policy setting Body of the Central Bank, there was a strong supporter of Fed loose monetary policy, including the controversial purchase of bonds that must be executed by June.

In recent weeks, a vocal minority of Fed officials warned here that the Central Bank may have to start raising interest rates later this year to keep prices in check. But it doesn't appear the most influential decision-makers in the Central Bank to share this view.

As long as inflation expectations will continue to remain stable, the increases seen so far in world commodity prices and headline inflation is unlikely to lead to a wage-price spiral seen in the past. Yellen said the Central Bank is better equipped to prevent the experience of the 1970s, when wages and prices spiraled upward as workers demanded compensation of earlier price rises and companies replied to higher labour costs with higher price rises.

Some regional officials Fed tightening policy that you want to prevent the construction of inflation, including President Charles plosser from the Philadelphia Fed, Richard Fisher from the Dallas Fed and narayana kocherlakota from the Minneapolis Fed. But the majority believes that it is not necessary because inflation is not a real threat and even the economy is still fragile.

Fed Chairman Ben bernanke last week downplayed inflation threats posed by higher commodity prices. Another influence Fed official made a similar case to Yellen on individual observations in Tokyo Monday. New York Fed President William Dudley, who is part of the rate setting Federal open market Committee, cautioned against raising rates in response caused by higher prices of commodities, such as the European Central Bank last week for inflation.

Yellen also highlighted another opposite impact higher gasoline and food prices, which could hurt economic growth by leading consumers to spend less and companies to cut back on investments. He said a sharp economic recovery is unlikely.

Recent economic data was mixed, with manufacturing jobs and gaining strength, while housing and consumer spending remains weak. Although the outlook is uncertain amid ongoing political turmoil in the Middle East and North Africa, and the uncertainty over financial policy at home, most economists predict growth to continue in 2011.

The US economic recovery is expected to gain momentum for the remainder of the year, despite a sharp pullback in growth during the first quarter-end only, according to economists surveyed by the Wall Street Journal.

With unemployment remains high and inflation is expected to remain low, the Fed is able to keep interest rates near zero and continue the bond market, Yellen said.

The $ 600-billion bond program, which began in mid-November and is set to run through June, aims to help the economy by keeping borrowing rates low, driving investors to more vulnerable assets such as stocks and lifting exportsmaintaining a low price of USD.

Critics and abroad accused the bond for fuelling a sharp increase in global commodity prices. But Yellen is stuck with the Fed that the increases driven by growing demand from rapidly developing economies such as China and the offer is less because of adverse weather conditions in some parts of the world.

View the original article here

Economists react: trade deficit in China

Posted initially in China real time.

China eked out a small trade surplus in March, the Government said, but he is still a deficit of 1.02 billion dollars in the first quarter, its first quarterly deficit in seven years, highlighting the impact of the increase in the price of imported commodities with greater export nation in the world. Analysts weigh:

The situation will be very different if commodity prices had not risen in the last 12 months. We estimate that in the first quarter surplus would be $ 25bn if China had paid the same price for the imports of essential goods, as it did a year ago. Imports of China commodities last month was relatively weak in volume terms …The trade surplus has undeniably limit, even if the driver of the shift is relaunching consumer spending that the Government has long said it wants to be an engineer. This means that it will prove to be short-lived, if it is not sustained by the current commodity prices. – Mark Williams, capital economics

Data measured — China recorded its first quarterly trade deficit from 2004 — may propose some significant progress of readjustment agenda, but it is still too early to make such a bold call. February s deficit was large enough to capture the whole quarter deficit, and in March data demonstrating a return to surplus — albeit a rather mild — it is clear where the trend is heading. 2011 you should see a surplus of around 250 billion dollars, to around 3,5% of GDP projected, although rather weak Q1 is indicative of the downside risks facing China internationally, and as such, full-year surplus be less thanwhat you initially expected. – Xianfang Ren and up Alistair Thornton, IHS Global Insight

Development of trade will remain strong due to robust real economy and the increase in prices, although I see some moderation in the growth of trade is partly due to base effects. Conditions are worse for China for surging oil prices, so that it can be shrunk much faster than the market had expected China s trade surplus. Monthly deficits are still possible, but for the entire year, China s trade is most likely stay in surplus (although smaller). However, we now see more risk to our forecast of US $ 150bn trade surplus in 2011. – Ting Lu, Bank of America-Merrill Lynch

Visible impact from Japan earthquake. Increase of imports from Japan, which slowed down in March, even compared to Feb. Meanwhile, the increase in exports to Japan held steady, recovering stronger levels pre-Feb. Disturbances by the quake and its aftershocks new attack will probably continue to have a similar effect in the coming months. The surplus with the United States and the EU both recovered from Feb, but both the second lowest level since last April. Peng-Keng, Minggao Shen Shuang Ding, and Ben Wei, Citigroup

– Compiled by Aaron Back

View the original article here

A survey of Economics Lecturers

Network Economics has opened a survey of teachers every second year six. The main purpose of this survey describes current practices and issues that concern students, lecturers and Anonymised aggregate report helps funders network economics, and information about how the economics lecturers use our services and what affects their tuition. We hope to complete the survey itself is an exercise that is useful for staff in the upper part of their teaching. 21 questions in this survey takes approximately 12 minutes to complete.

The network is an electronic book readers shows Kindle up to five entrants randomly selected to participate in the draw, the survey is open until 18 April.

View the original article here

A Conference for Economics instructors

If you, soon expect such as I, introductory economics to teach, or to you might be interested in this Conference. It is a one day-take, with the generous support from my Publisher (Southwestern, a part of Cengage Learning) on Friday, 29 April, Harvard constructed I.

The Conference consists of the following presentations of five Harvard Faculty:
Greg Mankiw, the challenges the U.S. monetary and fiscal policy policyAlberto Alesina, social policy in the United States and Europe: why so different? Eric Mazur, Confessions of a converted lecturerBen Friedman, religious influences on the economic thinking: where the economy have made we teaching?Jeremy Stein, Lessons from the financial CrisisIn addition, after lunch, have participants the option to tour of Harvard, and the day ends with a party at my home.

Interested in? Click through the link above to learn more. (Please note that space is limited.) (We may not be able all, who expressed interest, and for that I apologize in advance that.) If you have any questions, feel free John Carey at john.carey@cengage.com contact.

View the original article here

Things I have said nothing

Unfortunately, I could see not the content Fromt of this page.

View the original article here

Ripple effect Nerdiest

Unfortunately, I could see not the content Fromt of this page.

View the original article here

How public policy contributing to long-term unemployment?

Arnold Kling offers from an excellent piece by Eric

: s. Raymond have gone up in recent years by increasing the hidden span a seventy and downside risks associated with hiring an employee--you mean the minimum revenue-per-employee recruitment below that it makes no sense and has crept up to and untilgradually. This effect was partly masked from credit and asset bubbles, but these have now popped up. Increasingly it is not only the classic hard-core unemployables (alcoholics, criminal perverts, crazies) who cannot pull enough weight to justify a paycheck is marginal, moderate and mild

the dysfunctional.As a small business owner with a number of workers, I fully agree with this. The costs for the recruitment and retention of an employee in excess wages and include training costs, payroll taxes of employer side, health insurance and many other items. Some of them (though not all) are direct functions of Government (payroll taxes, and the minimum wage to low-wage jobs).

If a country really wants to reduce unemployment, the best solution would be to find ways of reducing the cost of employing workers. Payroll taxes by eliminating employer-side would be a good start. revenues that can be made up through the increased use of value added sales tax. Toggle the minimum wage for a negative income tax will also increase employment and promote economic efficiency. The second welfare theorem shows that modification of the purchase price, a good (such as a price floor on labor) would necessarily lead to inefficiency. We can achieve better results through society wants a straight transfer of wealth, as a negative income tax.

View the original article here

Some comments

Unfortunately, I could see not the content Fromt of this page.

View the original article here

The FED Lanker: rates may increase until the end of the year

The Federal Reserve destination could raise interest rates by the end of the year to keep inflation, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond President Jeffrey Lanker said Thursday.

Speaking to journalists here, said inflation risks Lanker during the last six months have been picked up, "after" rose "significantly."

"I think we're OK now, but I think the upside is higher now than six months ago," he added. "The danger now is that we exceeded ".

The Fed dropped interest rate short-term goal in almost zero in December 2008 during the economic crisis, and reiterated that it will follow for "an extended period."

However, several regional Fed Presidents over the past few weeks have discussed options for tightening monetary policy amid signs of stronger economic growth and potentially worrying signs of inflation.

US consumer prices in February rose by its fastest from mid-2009 as it has energy and food prices. Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy components and monitored closely by the Fed, was more subdued.

The US Central Bank buys $ 600 billion of Treasurys in an attempt to maintain low interest rates and stimulate the economy. The program started last year and is scheduled to run through June.

Lancker, an inflation hawk who opposed the plan-bond markets, has said repeatedly that the Fed should review at each meeting of the Federal open market Committee. He is currently a member of the FOMC vote.

He also said that the EDF should sell the entire portfolio of mortgage-backed securities "as soon as possible" because it does not believe the Central Bank will have to own any securities other than Treasurys.

The Fed holds more than 1 trillion dollars of mortgage-backed bonds purchased as part of a separate-bond effort to support the housing market.

"Financing the housing market can easily withstand a substantial award of our MBS holdings," he said. "I think that we should not fear the housing market spaces.

"Slightly higher mortgage spreads are not going to make a material difference to the prospects of the housing," he added.

Asked about the decision of the the European Central Bankto raise interest rates a quarter percentage point to 1.25%, Lanker said Thursday the ECB was a pioneer for the Fed's policy making. He said that the Fed will concentrate exclusively on domestic inflation and the overall outlook.

View the original article here

Video: Government shutdown, you care about?

One stop Government would delay the release of economic data and keeping Ahead of the WSJ's columnist tape Kelly Evans awake at night. But does anyone else care?

View the original article here

We need to rethink Canadian monetary policy?

An excellent post with worthwhile Canadian initiative-rethinking Canadian macroeconomic policy. A good read even if you're not Canadian. More interesting is the proposal for the Bank of Canada to raise the inflation target of 2% to 4%. I am skeptical of our ability to long-term inflation, but during the period of one year or so we will certainly succeed.

I do not believe a higher inflation rate will cause too many economic problems, where the Bank of Canada could hold steady between 3 and 5% reserved. I do not suppose that the problem of cost menu is much more of a problem at 4% instead of 2%. There will be some distributive consequences-the Bank of Canada will earn more in seignorage, will lose people with fixed incomes, the depreciation of the Canadian dollar (assuming our trading partners did not follow the same policy), so exporters would win but will become more expensive imports.

I agree with Mrs Stephen Gordon

says: when my point of departure is "if it ain't broke, don't fix it ' is not at all clear, and for me that failed objective of 2% as a policy ... We could probably safely trade low and stable inflation expectations against higher inflation and a constant as an insurance policy against hitting the lower bound, but it is not clear that this option is available for us ... Did we hit the lower bound or did we just graze? The Bank never really see fit to implement a policy of quantitative easing, even if it (rightly) laid down the foundations to

do so.One thing frustrating through entire downturn or crisis or anything else you want to call it is how many have received monetary policy interest rates. However, this is far from the Bank of Canada or the Federal Reserve only policy option, despite claims to the contrary by well-known economists. As someone who teaches macroeconomics, should my share of the blame. For a generation taught us that monetary policy change just the federal funds rate. Occasionally, we talked about changing the reserve ratio. I suppose it is not surprising that so many believe the zero bound problem is such an important-we never taught students that there are alternatives!

View the original article here

Of course, there is a case for a VAT!

Tyler Cowen asks: is there a case for a VAT?

I am shocked to know-there is, of course! The Federal Government of the UNITED STATES has very few options to search for themselves by tax hole. Tax options: substantial cuts in expenditure, which sounds good in theory, but what to cut? Hold down costs at the level of inflation and public revenue grows as the economy grows. Easier than cutting costs-but it will take at least a decade for the economy to grow large enough to increase government revenues enough to eliminate the deficit. Raise taxes. If you select option 3, then a value added tax, is more appropriate for the reasons set out in the effectiveness of value added tax (VAT) by income taxes.

Frederic Sautet worries that "VAT rates generally go up quickly, but rarely go" sounds funny this Canadian, as 7% GST, introduced two decades ago, replaced at 13% and MSFT has been reduced twice, and is now at 5%.

View the original article here

How to rebuild a nation war

When you try to rebuild a nation war, focus first on security, economic development. Then, make some highly visible improvements, such as free health care for young children or restore regular electricity. Also, hiring women police officers.

These are among the recommendations in a new report by the World Bank, which evaluate the best strategies for donor Nations, seeking to improve conditions in countries mired in self-perpetuating cycles of violence.

The Bank, which cover development projects each year, is trying to draw attention to a particular aspect of international development. In recent years, it has moved from a longtime focus on expensive projects to deal with broader issues such as climate change, and to embrace fundamental solutions.

This year's theme is the negative impact of violence on economic activity.

High levels of violence, political or criminal, is much more destructive than natural disasters. The report found that the criminal violence in Guatemala cut economic activity in 2005 by more than twice as much as the damage caused by Hurricane Stan.

"People in fragile and conflict-affected States is more than twice as likely to be undernourished as those in other developing countries, more than three times more likely to be able to send their children to schooltwo times more likely to see their children die before the age of 5kai more than twice as likely to have clean water, "says the report.

Special report, and sometimes surprising recipes are based on a study of Nations that we have made progress towards stability and prosperity, as well as Chile, Colombia, Ethiopia and Indonesia.

Firstly, an impressive warning: "Take a generation."

The World Bank reports that no nation has made significant and lasting progress towards the reduction of corruption in less than 14 years, and that on average it took 27 years successful Nations. Reduction of the role of military in politics? May not be less than 10 years, 17 years old on average.

Secondly, it underlines the importance of setting up first the legitimacy of a new political system, making rapid progress in some areas visible and tangible, rather than the standard trend to announce a long list of objectives.

"At the end of the 6 or 12 months people look back and say," the Government did? ' and they want to look back and see that there are two or three things that have changed, "said Sarah Cliffe, a principal author of the report.

The Government of South Africa after apartheid, focusing on providing health care for pregnant women and children under 5 years old. In Liberia, the Government has promised to restore electricity to Monrovia, the capital, within a year.

The report also touches on many occasions about the value of gender equality and women's participation in political decision-making, including law enforcement. In Nicaragua, for example, says the increased recruitment of women police officers produced a suppression of sexual violence. In Liberia, the report states that the creation of all-female who worked alongside local police helped to restore public confidence.

Two final proposals are the donor Nations. The report says that aid for ailing Nations too often jumps and plunging, which isn't healthy. He says instead that the donors should commit themselves to provide stable, reliable and long-term funding. Issues of corruption, inefficiency and ineffectiveness must be addressed through changes in management or focus, rather than a reduction of aid, the report says.

Source: report on the global development group calculations based O.E.C.D. a chart from the World Bank indicates instability in aid to four countries from year to year. Humanitarian aid and debt relief, are excluded from the statistics, will increase volatility, he said.

It also suggests using a Radical new method for evaluating the effectiveness of reconstruction efforts: asking people of recipient Nations. The World Bank considers such a poll as a way to prove his gradual progress even as it tries to shift investment in long-term projects that cannot be translated into tangible results as quickly.

View the original article here

Ran the incentives?

King in SCSUScholars about the proof (or non-evidence), that the stimulus package "work":

Most of what we write about the impact of incentives is simply that, "an effort to gain knowledge." Bureaucrat writes that some numbers. Journalists and bloggers find defects. Impact assessment of econometric models, but those models were used to propose the policy has been implemented. It is unlikely the models will go back and say the proposed plan did not work: econometric models are not built to do this: If the model has as a prerequisite that the future government expenditure will create jobsnot to say that past government expenditure does not. Meanwhile, the political opposition will appear to find inconsistencies, when really there is none. (GDP growth can lead to increased employment.) And people angrier and cynical.

There is nothing wrong with saying we do not know. This might have worked. This may not have. What we know is there are between three and four million fewer jobs than last year, the deficit is larger. We want to know more. Try to know more. And if the volume of studies since 2000, the great recession is any indication, we will still want to know more than a century now.

Excellent stuff. I agree wholeheartedly with King-a few items that can be gained directly from the statistics. There is no shame in saying that we are not sure. Because direct evidence is not necessarily so spotty, theory is important. An analysis of the theory behind fiscal stimulus shows that, as is the theory is constructed, it is not possible to work in the real world for anything but very serious crises.

View the original article here

FED's Fisher: you might need to be considered collapsed QE2

A key staff member Federal Reserve continued his drumbeat criticism Friday of the policy of the Central Bank debt market to drive forward economic growth, as well as he took the nation's political leaders to task, imploring them to get the budget under control.

Bloomberg NewsDallas Fed President Richard Fisher

"Continuous residence presents significant risks," said Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas President Richard Fisher . "No amount of further accommodation by the Fed would be wise — either extension or ' zoom out ' the volume of purchases of treasuries last June, or by adding another dose of large-scale asset purchases."

Fisher continued the reproach of the 600 billion dollars, which is set to end in the summer, saying: "it may well be looking at what remains collapsed" program, generally known as the QE2.

Dallas Fed President is a voting member of rate regulation Federal open market Committee, and for a number of months there has been a constant critic of attempts by the Fed to stimulate the development of buying longer-dated Treasury bonds. Fisher believes the economy simply don't need support now, and fears of additional liquidity of the Central Bank is provision may be setting a new round of financial market imbalances and to creating a wave of future inflation.

Much of what Fisher said in his speech Friday — comments came from the text of remarks prepared for delivery before a Conference of the society of American business editors and writers — was not new, although until Friday the Commander of the Central Bank had refrained from suggesting to QE2 to stop short. Fisher is not only a nuisance with the program, but remains in a minority, as officials such as Fed Chairman Ben bernanke and New York Fed President William Dudley remain steadfast supporters of the effort.

QE2 supporters believe increasing price pressures are connected with profits transitional basic products are themselves driven by forces outside the Fed's influence. In addition, see high unemployment, while keeping a lid on wages, the main upward pressure. Most economists expect the Fed to the completion of QE2 as planned.

In his remarks, Fisher reiterated that the Fed sees evidence of activities likely to cause problems. "My Gut tells me" firms may start briefly passes through the increase in the price of entry, and this will lead to some general price inflation numbers uncomfortable during the next few years. "

In addition, Adding even more liquidity, or withdraw in early what is already provided in abundance, will not stand for emerging inflationary pressures and perhaps also compound. "

Markets may also be getting drunk on what the Fed gave them. He warned of "intoxicating effects of ambrosia inexpensive and abundant money", and said "further enrichment of the Bowl hole with loose monetary policy would not rein in."

And as the Congress and the administration over a budget wrangle that hope will set the nation on a path to fiscal solvency, Fisher counseled the political class who "have no choice but to go through a painful and gut can recover and begin leading a sober life lives within your means."

"You can't have strong direct investment in the United States without confidence in the nation's ability to reverse the spiral of death, particularly the budget relentless accumulation of public debt and unfunded liabilities of Medicare and social security, "Fisher said.

View the original article here

IMF: ' increased rarity ' front for oil markets

Governments should be strengthened to "increased lack" world oil markets and the risk of further sharp price increases over the next few years, the International Monetary Fund warned Thursday.

While the impact of the Kosovars can only be a "little constraint on world economic growth in the medium and long term, the IMF said," such a benign impact on global growth should not be granted by a lack of development or the impact could be more important. "

"In practice, it is difficult to distinguish between unexpected changes in scarcity of oil and more traditional oil supply shocks, particularly temporary, short-term, when many of the consequences for the world economy will be like" the IMF said in a chapter of the World Economic Outlook released Thursday.

The full report will be released next week before the spring meeting of the IMF, where increasing commodity prices are expected to be discussed. The Fund called on political leaders around the world to ensure that their economies are designed for handling unexpected changes to oil supplies and prices — for example, by reducing fuel subsidies for the protection of the financial positions of the Governmentsbut also strengthen safety nets for the poor — and to encourage the promotion of alternative sources of energy policies.

Strong increase in oil demand from emerging market economies, coupled with concerns about possible supply disruptions from the Middle East, pushed prices up more than 25% the previous year. Crude oil in the United States handled about $ 109 a barrel Thursday on the New York Mercantile Exchange, while Brent crude in Europe traded near $ 122 a barrel.

With a nod to analysts who say the world oil production peaking will soon or has already started to decline, the report from the IMF acknowledged that maturing oil fields will restrict certain producers ' ability to add new capacity.

The return of annual growth of 1.8% of world oil production seen from 1981-2005 "seems unlikely," the Fund said. "The range of possibilities from larger than a direct voltage supply growth reduction in oil production, most permanently or temporarily."

The IMF's forecasts showed that the slowdown in the growth of world oil supplies by one percent, at 0.8%, will slow annual growth of real GDP of less than 0.25% of the medium and long term. Still, said the transfer of wealth from petroleum importers exporters will increase the flow of capital and enlarged current account imbalances.

However, economists warned the Fund for the potential for "large and sudden changes due to geopolitical risk in the oil market. "Adverse effects could be much higher, depending on the extent and evolution of the scarcity of oil and the global economy's ability to cope with the increased scarcity."

View the original article here

Which nation has the most progressive tax system?

Click here for the answer.

Update: Wow.  This short post really just a link to an another blog-proved to be more controversial than I expected.  Matthew Yglesias raises me America's youth about irresponsibly misleading.  Scott Sumner responds to Yglesias, pointed out is "If you're going to argue that it best not to make a serious mistake in your attack is people who make mistakes should be outlawed,."

The question is, what to do to this table:

Over at Yglesias blog, a very useful named Peter Whiteford commentor the table as follows:

I am the person who wrote the chapter in the OECD report, which is the basis of these figures. It is part of a report on the distribution of income to households, so that it contains no taxes are paid directly by households, as these are included in income surveys....[T] he table calculated the distribution of the taxes for the budget as according to the adjustment for the number of persons in the household, so that it will differ from data on the income tax are calculated back for household size. are not regulated

as others have pointed out this measure includes all direct taxes on individuals, so that you control and staff, but not employer payroll taxes includes social security contributions. Also not sales tax included it, but these are much harder in the most other OECD, and not as progressive as direct taxes, so if you indirect taxes in kind modeling it is almost certainly added by some that the United States of still the most progressive total tax.

Progressiveness is not the same as redistribution but emphasizes OECD report. Progressiveness is released measures such as the distribution of the tax burden, while the redistribution measures how much the tax system reduces inequality. Redistribution is both control of the progressiveness and the amount of the taxes gathered.

In fact, the US system of direct taxation actually reduced inequality, as well as more than any other country. A total of United States inequality reduces the most other countries but much less than, to take into account the other thing you need is what taxes spent to get.

Now the US social security system and cash benefits reduce inequality by less than any other OECD country except Korea. The US social security system is the OECD average slightly less progressive then, but the level of expenditure is very low, only Mexico and Korea of less in the OECD spend.

So while the U.S. tax system is progressive and inequality reduced, is the U.S. State of well being much less effective to reduce inequality. And because the United States of a very unequal distribution of income from capital and a much wider wage distribution than many other OECD countries, it ends up being relatively unequal country after taxes and benefits

If you look at the Nordic countries, they have all much less progressive tax systems as the United States, but they much more in taxes (including VAT). Then they spend this much higher taxes on social security and services, and it is this side of the equation, is the most important in reducing inequality.

So will not cause that the United States must either to increase or reduce the progressivity of the tax system. If you want to reduce inequality, must increase the taxes levied and spend effective.

View the original article here

What we're reading: China finally runs a trade deficit

Economy should not be complicated. Is the study of our lives — our jobs, our homes, our families and the small decisions we face every day. Here at Catherine Rampell, Economix, David Leonhardt and the other contributors will analyse the economic news and use as a framework for thinking about the world. We welcome your feedback, in mailto: economix@nytimes.com

View the original article here

The logic of cutting corporate taxes

Error in deserializing body of reply message for operation 'Translate'. The maximum string content length quota (8192) has been exceeded while reading XML data. This quota may be increased by changing the MaxStringContentLength property on the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML reader. Line 1, position 8831.
Error in deserializing body of reply message for operation 'Translate'. The maximum string content length quota (8192) has been exceeded while reading XML data. This quota may be increased by changing the MaxStringContentLength property on the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML reader. Line 1, position 15020.

Laura D’Andrea Tyson is a professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley, and served as chairwoman of the Council of Economic Advisers under President Clinton.

Corporate taxes –- or rather their absence –- have jumped to the top of the news in recent weeks, even drawing humorous commentary from Jon Stewart and Bill Maher. Many Americans are outraged to learn that some profitable American corporations pay little or no taxes in the United States, especially when corporate profits enjoyed their fastest growth ever in 2010.

Shouldn’t the government raise the corporate tax rate to require corporations to contribute their “fair share” to deficit reduction and to enhance the progressivity of the tax system? The answer is no.

In today’s world of mobile capital, increasing the corporate tax rate would be a bad way to generate revenues for deficit reduction, a bad way to increase the progressivity of the tax code and a bad way to help American workers and their families.

After the 1986 tax overhaul, the United States had one of the lowest corporate tax rates among the advanced industrial countries. Since then, these countries have been slashing their rates both to attract investment by American and other foreign companies and to discourage their own companies from shifting operations and profits to foreign locations offering even lower tax rates.

KPMG Corporate and Indirect Tax Rate Survey, 2008, published in “Growth and Competitiveness in the United States: The Role of Its Multinational Companies,” McKinsey Global Institute, June 2010.

The resulting “race to the bottom” in corporate tax rates has made the United States a less attractive place for both domestic and foreign investments, and that has encouraged American multinational companies to shift more of their income abroad, in ways permitted by the United States tax code.

The United States now has the highest corporate tax rate of all developed countries –- and is alone in its attempt to impose taxes on the worldwide income of its resident corporations. All other developed countries and most major emerging countries have adopted a territorial system that exempts most foreign income of their resident corporations from taxes.

Some critics, like Jeffrey Sachs, say the United States should resist participating in the race to the bottom and should champion a multilateral agreement that increases taxes on corporate income. My fellow Economix blogger Nancy Folbre made that same point on Monday.

But there is no sign that other countries are interested. The European Union can’t even agree on harmonizing the corporate tax rates of its member nations. In continuing negotiations over an European Union bailout package, Ireland has steadfastly rejected French and German demands to increase its low corporate tax rate (12.5 percent, the lowest rate in the European Union and one of the lowest in the world).

And Ireland has been wise to do so: its corporate tax incentives are credited with attracting significant amounts of foreign direct investment by European and American companies that fostered the Irish development miracle of the last decade.

The race to the bottom in corporate tax rates reflects intensifying competition among countries for mobile capital and technological know-how to support jobs and wages for immobile workers.

For many years, the conventional wisdom was that the corporate income tax was principally borne by the owners of capital in the form of lower returns. Now, with more mobile capital, workers are bearing more of the burden in the form of lower wages and productivity as investments move around the world in search of better tax treatment and higher returns.

In this environment, a high corporate tax rate not only undermines the growth and competitiveness of American companies; it is also increasingly ineffective as a tool to achieve more progressive outcomes in the taxation of capital and labor income.

The Obama administration and many members of Congress are calling for a significant reduction in the corporate tax rate to promote jobs and competitiveness, as well as a move to a territorial tax system.

At the same time, they are searching for ways to broaden the corporate tax base so that corporate tax revenues will either increase or remain unchanged, even with a lower tax rate. This search is proving difficult and may well produce an undesirable result.

A significant “revenue neutral” reduction in the corporate tax rate would require a significant broadening of the corporate tax base, and that in turn would require scaling back or eliminating three large corporate tax expenditures that reduce the cost of capital and encourage new investment and job creation in the United States: accelerated depreciation, the domestic manufacturing production deduction and the research and development tax credit.

Cutting these items to “pay for” a reduction in the corporate tax rate would increase the cost of new investments in the United States and could impose higher burdens on American workers, in the form of forgone productivity and wage growth. (For a discussion of the pros and cons of different options to reform the corporate tax system, see the President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board’s Report on Tax Reform Options: Simplification, Compliance and Corporate Taxation, published in August 2010.)

More promising ways to pay for a significant reduction in the corporate tax rate have been proposed.

Prof. Michael Graetz of Columbia Law School told the Senate Finance Committee that the shortfall in corporate tax revenues resulting from a cut in the corporate tax rate could be offset by the imposition of a corporate withholding tax on dividend and interest payments to shareholders and bondholders.

Many countries that have reduced their corporate tax rates have raised taxes on these groups; the United States has been going in the opposite direction.

According to a recent study by Rosanne Altshuler, Benjamin H. Harris and Eric Toder, restoring tax rates on dividends and capital gains to their pre-1997 level of 28 percent could finance a reduction in the federal corporate tax rate to 26 percent from 35 percent.

Such a change would both reduce the incentive for corporations to move investments abroad and increase the progressivity of tax outcomes by shifting more of the burden of corporate taxation from labor to capital owners.

Professor Graetz, and more recently, William G. Gale and Mr. Harris have proposed introducing a value-added tax to reduce the deficit and to finance a reduction in the corporate tax rate.

Most countries that have reduced their corporate tax rates have a value added tax that accounts for a significant share of their tax revenues. To offset the regressive effects of a value added tax, countries have used lower value-added-tax rates on items like food, health care and education, as well as cash subsidies for poor households.

I believe that a federal value added tax with such offsets should be considered as part of a balanced multiyear deficit-reduction package that includes a sizeable reduction in the corporate tax rate.

Many Americans who are outraged that American corporations pay little or no corporate tax would be equally outraged to learn that more than 50 percent of all business income is earned by partnerships, sole proprietorships and S corporations, many of which are very large and profitable and enjoy the same legal benefits as regular corporations and do not pay corporate taxes.

Broadening the corporate tax base to include more business organizations with corporate characteristics would allow for a revenue-neutral reduction in the corporate tax rate that would make the United States a more attractive location for both foreign and domestic investments, with benefits for American workers.

The United States needs a significantly lower tax rate on corporate income, not a higher one.

View the original article here

Secondary sources: home prices, global recovery, fiscal expenditure

A summary of economic news from around the Web.

–Home prices: which calculates risks is upon the charts to show changes in nominal House prices, prices adjusted for inflation and price ratio-to-rent. "In nominal terms, the national index is back in the first quarter of 2003, the composite 20 index is slightly above the low of May 2009, and the index CoreLogic back to January 2003 in real terms, the national index is back in the first quarter of 2000 the epipedato composite 20 index is back to January 2001CoreLogic, and the index back to January 2000, on the basis of price-to-rent, the Composite Index 20 is exactly above the levels of May 2009 and the index is back to CoreLogic January 2000. "

–Global recovery: eswar prasad and karim foda monitor global indicators and to say the recovery is more solid basis. "Despite recent crises and setbacks suffered by the global economic upturn, however is a more solid basis. The update of April 2011 the Brookings Institution times monitoring indexes for global economic recovery (TIGER) indicates that the growth and increasing employment will recover consumer confidence and business provide some necessary force for recovery in advanced economies. Emerging markets are still doing very well, but some of the shine is coming off of these economies as they strengthen policies to cope with the increasing inflation. "

-Tax expenditure: roberton Williams discusses the recent Supreme Court decision concerning tax concessions. "Since then, Stanley Surrey popularized the concept of tax expenditure nearly half a century back, economists have argued that many tax breaks are equivalent to public expenditure. Almost every program costs can be turned into a tax expenditure that directs money the same way. This week the Supreme Court rejected the equivalence, ruled that a tax credit from an Arizona differed quite comparable to deny direct spending program to taxpayers the right to sue on the basis that the appropriation represented an unconstitutional government activity. The Court s decision suggests that, while the majority in this decision may be great lawyers, economists have developed. "

By Phil Izzo

View the original article here

The Japan more vulnerable to the loss of manufacturing jobs

One reason why Japan is more vulnerable to a flight of manufacturing jobs is that manufacturing has developed economies most to lose from the USA and others.

Administrators of corporate Japan s place a high premium on the benefits of producing it domestically, and preached the mantra of mono-zukuri or things are progressing well. Japanese manufacturers have tried to be a delicate balance of maintaining production at home, even as the size of the population. Even the inevitable rise of the yen against the dollar has become a transaction costs — more annoyance than insuperable. Japan has a market share of 13% for shipbuilding, third after South Korea and China. Approximately two-thirds of Japan machine tools exported in accordance with Japan machine tool Builders Association.

As a result, Japan s economy remain manufacturing depends more than almost any other developed country. In Japan, 17,2% of workers was built in 2009. in the United States, approximately 10% is a tally by the Bureau of Labor Statistics US show.

Production in Japan amounted to 20.2% of the value added in Japan in 2009, compared to 19.1% in export champion Germany 12.9% in the USA and, according to UN figures.

As in other advanced economies, manufacturing s importance for the economy of Japan s declining even before the quake. For the first time last year, China produced more machine tools from Japan.

View the original article here

Our children financial crisis

Unfortunately, I could see not the content Fromt of this page.

View the original article here

Chicago Fed paper: commodity prices spurred inflation core

Rising commodity prices are not very difficult underlying inflation and does not require a policy response by the Federal Reserve, says a new document that co-authored by the head of the Federal Reserve of Chicago.

The survey, released Monday, psept, in controversial issue of whether a sharp increase in commodity prices, energy, food or raw materials, will drive on subsequent surge in inflation.

Most central bankers have argued so far reduced role in commodity prices in the operation of the US economy means that the underlying inflation will remain under control. Last week, Fed Chairman Ben bernanke described the recent gain in prices as "transitional".

But that is not well with many location Sat in financial markets. Some Fed officials are also uncomfortable with the risk of being complacent in the face of a potential threat of inflation and the recent surveys of inflation expectations show the wider public increasing worry more about price pressures, at least in the long term close outlook.

The Chicago Fed paper counts as a co-author, Bank President Charles Evans. Currently owns a part interest rate setting voting Federal open market Committeeand is one of the staunchest supporters of the Central Bank's bond continues $ 600 billion, buying program known as QE2. Evan public credit report with Jonas Fisher, Director of the Bank of the macroeconomic research.

"Clearly, higher food prices and energy lead to broader measures of consumer price inflation, as the consumer price index," said the paper. But, during the last generation "sharp increases and decreases in prices of commodities had little, if not, impact on core inflation, a measure which excludes food and energy prices," wrote the policy makers.

In the Bible, Evans and Fisher also claimed that jumps prices don't get much response from the Federal Reserve policy, either. Since the mid-1980s "reactions both basic inflation and the federal funds rate (the average monetary policy) in disorders of oil and other commodity prices was extremely moderate," they wrote.

Focus of the Bible into core inflation likely will not disturb many observers, who have long been blanched at the Fed the dependence on core inflation measurements. The Federal Reserve has faced much criticism for downplaying the impact of some of the most important values for consumers and businesses face on a daily basis. Fed officials have countered by using core values as a guide policy gives them a less volatile way to get a handle on inflation.

The Paper supports one of the main causes for commodity prices did not cause widespread weeds is due to the public has greater confidence will act properly Fed. "Assuming that there is a generally high level of trust of the Central Bank, there is no reason for such expectations continue – in fact, during the period post-Volcker, there have been no signs that usually do," the paper said, referring Paul volcker, the legendary central banker who broke the back of inflation three decades ago.

The Paper concluded that oil prices are mainly a force for retard growth, such as sap consumer spending ability, is a familiar discrepancy between the central banks.

View the original article here

CEA chairs on the budget deficit

Click here for an important article by a bipartisan group of ten former President and Chairman of the Council of economic advisers signed to read.  I have never previously been a large and distinguished group of co-authors.

View the original article here

Teaching and Learning Awards 2011

Network Economics is now accepting nominees for the annual award of the welcome offered myself or colleagues there are three categories of awards: nominated outstanding teaching students and has awarded eLearning follow the link for details of the terms and conditions of the winner.

View the original article here

A comic for Chapter 4

Error in deserializing body of reply message for operation 'Translate'. The maximum string content length quota (8192) has been exceeded while reading XML data. This quota may be increased by changing the MaxStringContentLength property on the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML reader. Line 2, position 8157.
Error in deserializing body of reply message for operation 'Translate'. The maximum string content length quota (8192) has been exceeded while reading XML data. This quota may be increased by changing the MaxStringContentLength property on the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML reader. Line 1, position 9078.
Greg Mankiw's Blog: A Comic for Chapter 4 /*-----------------------------------------------Blogger Template StyleName: MinimaDesigner: Douglas BowmanURL: www.stopdesign.comDate: 26 Feb 2004----------------------------------------------- */body { background:#fff; margin:0; padding:40px 20px; font:x-small Georgia,Serif; text-align:center; color:#333; font-size/* */:/**/small; font-size: /**/small; }a:link { color:#191970; text-decoration:underline; }a:visited { color:#191970; text-decoration:underline; }a:hover { color:red; text-decoration:underline; }a img { border-width:0; }/* Header----------------------------------------------- */@media all { #header { width:660px; margin:0 auto 10px; border:2px solid #333399; } }@media handheld { #header { width:90%; } }#blog-title { margin:5px 5px 0; padding:20px 20px .25em; border:1px solid #333399; border-width:1px 1px 0; font-size:225%; line-height:1.2em; font-weight:bold; color:#333399; text-transform:uppercase; font-variant: small-caps; letter-spacing:.18em;background-color: white; }#blog-title a { color:#333399; text-decoration:underline; }#blog-title a:hover { color:red; }#description { margin:0 5px 5px; padding:0 20px 20px; border:1px solid #333399; border-width:0 1px 1px; max-width:700px; font:115%/1.4em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Arial,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:none; letter-spacing:.18em; color:#333399;background-color:white; }/* Content----------------------------------------------- */@media all { #content { width:660px; margin:0 auto; padding:0; text-align:left; } #main { width:410px; float:left; } #sidebar { width:220px; float:right; } }@media handheld { #content { width:90%; } #main { width:100%; float:none; } #sidebar { width:100%; float:none; } }/* Headings----------------------------------------------- */h2 { margin:1.5em 0 .75em; font:90%/1.4em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Arial,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:uppercase; font-weight:normal; letter-spacing:.18em; color:#404040; }/* Posts----------------------------------------------- */@media all { .date-header { margin:1.5em 0 .5em; } .post { margin:.5em 0 1.5em; border-bottom:1px solid #BBB; padding-bottom:1.5em; } }@media handheld { .date-header { padding:0 1.5em 0 1.5em; } .post { padding:0 1.5em 0 1.5em; } }.post-title { margin:.25em 0 0; padding:0 0 4px; font-size:160%; font-weight:normal; line-height:1.4em; color:#990033; }.post-title a, .post-title a:visited, .post-title strong { display:block; text-decoration:none; color:#c60; font-weight:normal; }.post-title strong, .post-title a:hover { color:#333; }.post div { margin:0 0 .75em; line-height:1.6em; }p.post-footer { margin:-.25em 0 0; color:#ccc; }.post-footer em, .comment-link { font:75%/1.4em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Arial,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:small-caps; letter-spacing:.1em; }.post-footer em { font-style:normal; color:#505050; margin-right:.6em; }.comment-link { margin-left:.6em; }.post img { padding:4px; border:1px solid #ddd; }.post blockquote { margin:1em 20px; }.post blockquote p { margin:.75em 0; }/* Comments----------------------------------------------- */#comments h4 { margin:1em 0; font:bold 78%/1.6em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Arial,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:.2em; color:#999; }#comments h4 strong { font-size:130%; }#comments-block { margin:1em 0 1.5em; line-height:1.6em; }#comments-block dt { margin:.5em 0; }#comments-block dd { margin:.25em 0 0; }#comments-block dd.comment-timestamp { margin:-.25em 0 2em; font:78%/1.4em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Arial,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:.1em; }#comments-block dd p { margin:0 0 .75em; }.deleted-comment { font-style:italic; color:gray; }/* Sidebar Content----------------------------------------------- */#sidebar ul { margin:0 0 1.5em; padding:0 0 1.5em; border-bottom:1px solid white; list-style:none; }#sidebar li { margin:0; padding:0 0 .25em 15px; text-indent:-15px; line-height:1.5em; }#sidebar p { color:#666; line-height:1.5em; }/* Profile----------------------------------------------- */#profile-container { margin:0 0 1.5em; border-bottom:1px solid white; padding-bottom:1.5em; }.profile-datablock { margin:.5em 0 .5em; }.profile-img { display:inline; }.profile-img img { float:left; padding:4px; border:1px solid #bbb; margin:0 8px 3px 0; }.profile-data { margin:0; font:bold 78%/1.6em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Arial,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:.1em; }.profile-data strong { display:none; }.profile-textblock { margin:0 0 .5em; }.profile-link { margin:0; font:78%/1.4em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Arial,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:.1em; }/* Footer----------------------------------------------- */#footer { width:660px; clear:both; margin:0 auto; }#footer hr { display:none; }#footer p { margin:0; padding-top:15px; font:78%/1.6em "Trebuchet MS",Trebuchet,Verdana,Sans-serif; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:.1em; } @import url(http://www.blogger.com/static/v1/v-css/navbar/697174003-classic.css);div.b-mobile {display:none;} Greg Mankiw's Blog Random Observations for Students of Economics

Monday, April 04, 2011 A Comic for Chapter 4 click on graphic to enlarge? permanent link

About MeName: Greg Mankiw Location: United States I am a professor of economics at Harvard University, where I teach introductory economics (ec 10) among other courses. I use this blog to keep in touch with my current and former students. Teachers and students at other schools, as well as others interested in economic issues, are welcome to use this resource.

View my complete profile

Useful Links My Harvard Website My Favorite Textbooks Old Columns and Talks The Best Way To Learn Economics Blog Map for Textbook Users Previous Posts A Profile of Al Roth A V, 2 Us, and an L I make the big time Should the United States depend on foreign supplie... A Striking Scatterplot Scott Sumner to the rescue Stiglitz on the Deficit Our Children's Financial Crisis Even terrorists have downward-sloping demand curve... The Citation Impact of Open Access Advice for Students Advice for Aspiring Economists Where do economists come from? Choosing a Graduate Program Advice for Grad Students Advice for New Junior Faculty Which math courses? Why Aspiring Economists Need Math Love Econ, Bad at Math Summer Reading List JD vs PhD: My Story My Life as a Student PhD or not? Education Beyond the Classroom An engineer seeks career advice A Question about Learning Economics Good Academic, Bad Human Being Are B-school economists different? How to Write Well Principles of Economics Translated Animated Rap Version Acrostic Version A Few Timeless Posts A Must Read The Pigou Club Manifesto Resolutions for Another New Year Outsourcing Redux How do the right and left differ? How to Decentralize Monetary Policy On Inequality How to Recapitalize the Financial System My Personal Work Incentives On Dogs, Names, and Boston How to Identify My Car Powered by Postrank

Archives March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011

 

 

View the original article here